Comments on: Markov Experiment II http://codehop.com/markov-experiment-ii/ #code #art #music Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:08:46 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38 By: Jim Aikin http://codehop.com/markov-experiment-ii/#comment-431 Tue, 27 Jul 2010 05:56:52 +0000 http://csound.noisepages.com/?p=525#comment-431 Very nice. I’m going to study the .csd to see how you did it. It might be interesting to add a little more variability in the choice of the next note by setting up a bank of sliders in QuteCsound.

The next step would be to split the rhythm durations apart from the pitch choices — not completely, as it’s nice when there’s a perceptible relationship (a self-similarity of notes at a certain pitch), but with a little more flexibility.

]]> By: Evan http://codehop.com/markov-experiment-ii/#comment-430 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 16:30:31 +0000 http://csound.noisepages.com/?p=525#comment-430 Yes, in fact all of David Cope’s work is, at its core, based on Markov Models. He runs an analysis of a corpus of work (like, operas by Mozart for instance, or a few of his own pieces), and this generates a massive markov model, which is then used with other processes to generate a new piece of music.
 

]]> By: ultrafastx http://codehop.com/markov-experiment-ii/#comment-429 Wed, 07 Jul 2010 07:40:54 +0000 http://csound.noisepages.com/?p=525#comment-429 Interesting.  I didn’t realize that Markovian processes were used in music.

]]>